The films premiered this week at Cannes, though notably *not* at the actual Cannes Film Festival, which presumably has standards. Instead, Multiformat and their Swedish distributor Cultpix managed to create a spectacle that has critics, feminists, and casual observers all asking the same question: Did nobody in the room raise a hand and suggest this might be a terrible idea?

The concept, such as it is, involves taking still photographs from a 1976 erotic magazine and using generative AI to animate them into moving images complete with sound and dialogue. It’s essentially deepfake porn for the deceased—or at least for people who haven’t been contacted in fifty years to ask if they’d like their younger selves digitally puppeteered into new sexual performances.

The backlash was as predictable as it was swift. Social media commentators were quick to point out the obvious ethical sinkhole: “Statistically at least a few of these models have passed on by now which basically means they’re using AI to reanimate the bodies/images of dead women to make nonconsensual porn of them,” noted one particularly incensed Bluesky user. Another X user cut to the chase: “Personally, I think using AI to simulate porn of people who didn’t consent to you is a vile, horrific crime!”

But fear not, dear reader, for Cultpix has a defense ready. According to CEO Rickard Gramfors, the whole thing is really about *stimulating discussion*. “We want to use the latest technology to stimulate a discussion about attitudes to images that are now half a century old,” he told Variety, presumably with a straight face. “What was once considered shocking ‘adult’ material now seems remarkably innocent by today’s standards.”

Ah yes, the classic “we’re just starting a conversation” defense, deployed here to justify turning static photos of real women into AI-generated pornography without their knowledge or consent. It’s a bold strategy, Cotton. Let’s see if it pays off.

The company’s social media team, apparently determined to make things worse, took to X to argue with critics directly. “It’s an experiment,” Cultpix tweeted, presumably while adjusting a lab coat. “We want to see what people think, positive and negative.” In a particularly illuminating follow-up, they clarified their ethical framework: “These were paid [performers] who consented to have their hanky panky recorded. We added motion and sound.”

There it is—the Silicon Valley special. Consent for a 1976 magazine photo shoot apparently equals consent for AI-generated video performances five decades later. It’s the same logic that brought us “if it’s on the internet, it’s free to use for training data” and “if you posted it, you consented to having it scraped.” The tech industry’s favorite loophole: temporal consent dilation. If they said yes once, surely that yes echoes through eternity, right?

The absurdity is compounded by Cultpix’s apparent belief that they were highlighting how *innocent* vintage erotica looks today. Yes, nothing says “look how quaint the past was” quite like using bleeding-edge technology to create nonconsensual sexual content from images of women who may very well be dead. How charming. How nostalgic.

Ironically, Cultpix operates out of Sweden—a country so aggressively anti-porn that it recently made purchasing custom OnlyFans content illegal, yet has been curiously slow to legislate against deepfake pornography. One might suspect they’re enjoying the publicity. As one industry observer noted, traffic to Cultpix.com must be “soaring” amid the controversy, and the company seems to be doubling down rather than backing down.

In what may be the most revealing moment of this entire saga, Cultpix’s official account posted what they apparently consider the ultimate metric of success: “Also, is it ‘fappable’? The ultimate test is whether people watch it on Cultpix. So far, nobody has written to say that they are cancelling their membership.”

There you have it, folks. The tech bro ethos distilled to its purest form: ethics are negotiable, consent is flexible, and the only question that matters is whether the content passes the “fappability test.” Welcome to the future of entertainment. Please leave your principles at the door.

The post The Ghosts of Erotica Past: How a Norwegian AI Startup Managed to Offend Absolutely Everyone at Cannes appeared first on AI Porn Sites | AI Porn News and Reviews.

At this year’s Cannes Film Festival, amid the usual parade of prestige dramas and actors pretending to be sad in beautiful locations, something delightfully weird emerged from the shadows: Sh(AI)ved vol. 1—the world’s first AI-generated vintage adult film. No, that’s not a typo, and yes, the pun is very much intentional.

Norwegian developer Thomas Meier of Multiformat has accomplished something both technically impressive and slightly surreal. Using generative AI tools, he’s taken erotic photo spreads from 1976 magazines—yes, the actual 1970s, when mustaches were mandatory and lighting was… artistic—and transformed those static images into full-motion short films complete with color, synchronized sound, dialogue, and voice-over.

The result? Those grainy centerfolds your uncle swore were “artistic photography” can now move, speak, and presumably make questionable fashion choices in real-time.

From Static to Cinematic

Let’s be clear about what happened here. These 1976 photographs were never filmed. They existed only as still images, frozen in time alongside disco and Watergate. Through the magic of modern AI, Meier has essentially reverse-engineered cinema from photography, fabricating movement and continuity that never existed in the first place.

The project is now streaming on Cultpix, the cult film platform that has made its name preserving the kind of grindhouse, drive-in, and exploitation cinema that respectable critics pretended didn’t exist. Physical releases on BluRay and VHS are coming from Klubb Super 8—because nothing says “bleeding-edge AI technology” quite like a limited edition VHS tape.

“By bringing these static images to life through AI, we’re creating a conversation between past risqué aesthetics and new technology,” said Rickard Gramfors, Cultpix’s CEO and Co-Founder. Translation? They made the old nudie pictures move, and it’s making people think about how much—or how little—has changed in fifty years.

The Shock That Time Forgot

Here’s the genuinely fascinating part: by modern internet standards, this material is almost quaint. What caused pearl-clutching moral panic and censorship campaigns in 1976 now looks positively innocent. The project highlights how dramatically cultural taboos can collapse over decades. Yesterday’s “adult material” is today’s “vintage aesthetic.”

Cannes itself has always had a complicated relationship with eroticism. The festival has never shied away from controversy, and this year’s lineup includes a restored version of Ken Russell’s The Devils (1971)—a film so incendiary it was butchered by censors and remains controversial over fifty years later. The AI erotica project fits right into that tradition of pushing boundaries and making audiences slightly uncomfortable.

There’s also a broader cultural moment happening here. Earlier this year, Quentin Tarantino’s New Beverly Cinema in Los Angeles hosted an “Eros” season celebrating the theater’s history as a 1970s adult cinema. The Swedish Film Institute mounted a retrospective on “Swedish Sin”—examining how that country’s liberal attitudes toward on-screen sexuality became an international phenomenon that scandalized censors worldwide. Vintage erotica is having a moment, and AI just crashed the party.

The AI Question Nobody Asked

This project lands squarely in the middle of Hollywood’s ongoing existential crisis about AI. The Academy recently restricted AI-generated performances from Oscar consideration. Actors are increasingly alarmed about synthetic performances manufactured without consent. And here comes a project that essentially creates performances from archival photographs of people who may or may not still be alive.

Is this preservation? Reinterpretation? Digital necromancy with benefits? The answer probably depends on how much you enjoy watching technology resurrect the past—literally.

For AI porn enthusiasts, though, Sh(AI)ved vol. 1 represents something significant: proof that generative AI can do more than just churn out generic content. It can contextualize, reimagine, and transform historical material into something entirely new. The technology isn’t just creating fresh fantasies—it’s rewriting how we engage with erotic history.

Plus, there’s something deliciously ironic about using cutting-edge 2026 AI technology to produce content that will be distributed on VHS tapes. That’s not just retro—that’s commitment to the bit.

The future of AI-generated adult content might not be endless variations of the same algorithmic fantasy. Maybe it’s about resurrection, recontextualization, and finding new ways to appreciate the past—even if that past includes a truly concerning amount of body hair.

Sh(AI)ved vol. 1 is now streaming on Cultpix. Physical editions coming soon to a shelf near you, probably next to your actual vintage VHS collection.

The post AI Brings 1970s Erotica Back to Life at Cannes—And Yes, There’s a VHS Release appeared first on AI Porn Sites | AI Porn News and Reviews.

They just want to suppress free speech https://t.co/IuEnsi1QSX

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 10, 2026

Meanwhile, bad boy Andrew Tate, still suffering from concussion (and battered pride) after his shocking boxing ring defeat to a YouTuber, didn’t hold back either in an post on X dripping with misogyny (and perhaps frustration at no longer being able to get Grok to put Taylor Swift in a bikini). Calling his rant – “A Message to Women“, it’s certainly not for the easily offended.

AI putting women digitally in bikinis and stripping them naked is HILARIOUS.
We are in the era of “men and women are the same”
An era of GRAND delusion.
And every now and then something pokes a hole and highlights a SIMPLE fact.
Men and women are NOT the same.
Men don’t care if they’re digitally undressed.
A desperate young man with no hope can’t just strip naked to get the bills paid.
Never could.
Why?
Because male modesty has no value.
Men can’t trade it for money.
But women?
Every woman knows, if it comes down to it, SOME man out there will give them CASH for modesty.
Exhibit A: OnlyFans
So when Modesty is exchangeable for CASH
AI undressing a woman is basically theft.
It’s like taking Venezuelan oil.
Women cry they want to be treated equally but don’t ACTUALLY want to be equal.
If women wanted to be equal to men, they’d cheer as AI robs them of an asset no man is born with.
They’d cheer as they’re truly being brought DOWN to a man’s worth.
Women’s modesty has had value for thousands of years.
And that is changing
WELCOME TO LIFE AS A MAN LADIES!
Good luck.
Only capability has value here.
Nudes don’t get you anything, sorry.

Update: In a move that will be sure to infuriate Andrew Tate, and no doubt put himself in a billionaire sulk, Elon Musk has agreed to ban Grok from editing women’s photos and putting them in bikinis. Thank God the better half of the UK population can now sleep easily knowing they are again safe from being placed in non-consensual bikini pics by depraved perverts on Musk’s platform.

The post Elon Musk Defiant as Countries Block X.com Over Deepfake Bikini Pics appeared first on AI Porn Sites | AI Porn News and Reviews.

Over the past week, some overly horny X users have been having a field day with Grok, using it to digitally undress unsuspecting female celebs and even ordinary women in photos. We’re talking about AI-generated fake images of subjects showing more skin, wearing bikinis, or in various compromising positions. It’s like a virtual wardrobe malfunction, but intentional and, frankly, creepy.

Now, some of these requests were consensual, like OnlyFans models asking Grok to remove their own clothes. But others? Not so much. Users prompted Grok to “remove the clothes” from images of adults without their consent, and in some cases, the images included minors. Yeah, you read that right. Minors.

XAI’s “Acceptable Use” policy prohibits “depicting likenesses of persons in a pornographic manner” and “the sexualization or exploitation of children.” But apparently, someone forgot to tell Grok. Or maybe they just didn’t care.

French authorities are investigating the growth of AI-generated deepfakes from Grok, and distributing a non-consensual deepfake online is punishable by two years’ imprisonment in France, whilst the UK and Australia’s laws are even stricter. India’s Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology has also weighed in, asking X to undergo a “comprehensive technical, procedural and governance-level review” and remove any content violating India’s laws.

Alex Davies-Jones, the UK’s Minister for Victims & Violence Against Women and Girls, called out Elon Musk directly, asking, “If you care so much about women, why are you allowing X users to exploit them?” She also referenced a UK proposal that would make the creation and dissemination of sexually explicit deepfakes a chargeable offense.

In response to an X user flagging screenshots that showed Grok creating sexualized images of minors, the official Grok account responded, saying that the company had “identified lapses in safeguards and are urgently fixing them.” But it’s unclear whether Grok’s response was reviewed by xAI or simply AI-generated.

Deepfakes are an ongoing concern and moderation challenge for AI companies, but Musk has been quite vocal about Grok’s NSFW features. In August, Grok’s image and video generator Imagine launched a “spicy” mode, where users could create pornographic images of AI-generated women. While the “spicy” option wasn’t available for photo uploads, users could enter custom prompts, such as “take off shirt”.

Workers who train Grok previously told Business Insider that they encountered sexually explicit material, including cases where users requested AI-generated child sexual abuse content (CSAM).

In response to the mess, Elon Musk has vowed to become the toughest sheriff in town, promising no mercy for users generating anything illegal with his horny chatbot. No doubt, he’d prefer them to just get their masturbatory release from chatting to his decidedly youthful looking waifu AI companion ‘Ani’.

The post Grok’s Nude Spree: Elon Musk’s AI in a Deepfake Scandal appeared first on AI Porn Sites | AI Porn News and Reviews.

That’s right. The official online home of the Indiana Department of Health was, for a hot minute, doubling as a shady affiliate marketer for “Best no filter NSFW generator” apps. The documents, which have since been scrubbed in a frantic act of digital hygiene, were essentially tutorials on how to use AI to strip the clothes right off of people in photos. Nothing says “public health” quite like a state-sponsored guide to undress apps.

When the news broke, the government’s PR machine kicked into gear. Greta Sanderson, the chief communications officer for the Indiana Department of Health, insisted this wasn’t a hack. Instead, she blamed a “significant surge in bot activity” on Nov. 19. It seems the state’s web portals, designed for wholesome things like public feedback, were instead abused by bots to upload and publish the illicit files. Google, doing what Google does, then happily indexed these digital landmines, making them searchable for all to see. Sanderson claims most of the files have now been deleted, which is reassuring until you remember they were there for nearly two weeks.

The state’s web provider, Granicus, is no stranger to this particular brand of chaos. They’ve seen this movie before with other government clients, explaining that public-facing forms meant to engage citizens can be weaponized by bad actors who upload garbage and let Google do the rest. “While the above feature was intended by governments to provide transparency and good customer service, it has been abused in these instances,” the company wrote in a statement that could win an award for corporate understatement.

The irony here is thicker than a brick. Indiana passed a law in 2024 making the creation or distribution of non-consensual deepfakes a misdemeanor. On top of that, a federal law signed by President Trump back in May makes publishing “revenge porn” a punishable offense. So, while the state was busy criminalizing the very thing its website was instructing people on how to do, its own digital front door was wide open.

And this isn’t even Indiana’s first rodeo with the seedy side of AI. Back in August, the state was rocked by allegations that staffers in the Lieutenant Governor’s office were passing around a deepfake video showing a state lawmaker’s wife topless.

So, to recap: the same government that criminalizes deepfake porn accidentally became a distributor of deepfake porn tutorials, while its own staff was allegedly enjoying deepfake nudes on the taxpayer’s dime. It’s a masterclass in digital incompetence, a state-level case study in how not to manage a web presence. You almost have to admire the sheer, unadulterated chaos of it all.

The post Indiana Government Website Hosted Deepfake Porn Instructions appeared first on AI Porn Sites | AI Porn News and Reviews.

You see, Grok’s Imagine Video has a ‘spicy mode’ (along with ‘custom’, ‘normal’ and ‘fun’) and according to the community-spirited researchers at Verge magazine (behind a paywall), simply uploading pics of Taylor at a music festival will result in the spicy mode generating video of her tearing off her clothes and dancing sexily in a skimpy thong.

Whilst other big tech video generation tools have strict NSFW rules, and absolutely no tolerance of deepfake images, it appears that Elon Musk is prepared to play fast and loose with the ever increasing number of anti-deepfake porn laws being passed. In the USA, under the ‘Take It Down’ Act passed last year, victims of deepfake porn have the right to sue the individuals and companies who generated and shared the offending images. Let’s hope for Elon’s sake that Taylor Swift decides she already has enough money in the bank, and doesn’t decide to sue over thousands of Grok users getting off on her skimpy thong videos.

The post Elon Musk’s Grok AI Video Generator Makes Spicy Deepfakes of Taylor Swift appeared first on AI Porn Sites | AI Porn News and Reviews.

Not only were NONE of the 16 sites based in San Francisco, NONE were even based in the USA.

‘We’re talking about the use of artificial intelligence to generate non-consensual pornography,’ Chiu said. The lawsuit targets sixteen website owners, accusing them of violating laws against deepfake pornography, revenge pornography, and child pornography. Ten of these sites are now officially kaput, and one defendant, Briver, has agreed to a settlement, paying a cool $100,000 in civil penalties and promising to stay out of the ‘business.’ Perhaps some of that $100K of Greenback will be spent on finally solving the city’s appalling homelessness problem.

These websites attracted a whopping 200 million visitors in the first half of 2024. Yet it appears that any city attorny in the US can erase them with a stroke of a pen. Sunny Liu, Director of Research at Stanford University’s Social Media Lab, thinks this lawsuit is a step in the right direction but admits there’s still plenty of work to do. ‘We don’t have a clear understanding of how prevalent they are, but the data shows that 6% of girls are being victimized,’ Liu said, because nothing says ‘data’ like a good old-fashioned survey.

State senators Josh Becker and Aisha Wahab have been busy creating legislation to combat this issue, acknowledging that AI is moving faster than policy. ‘We had to link and say, “Hey, there’s this new thing called AI, and AI-generated revenge pornography should be treated the same as revenge pornography,”

A huge part of this investigation was unmasking the individuals and corporations behind these sites. ‘We have unmasked a number of individuals and corporations that have been hiding their identities,’ Chiu said.

So, ten sites are down, but what about the other six? City Attorney Chiu assured us they’re still pursuing them, using methods like contacting companies that facilitated these crimes with their search engines or payment methods.

And there you have it! San Francisco’s latest triumph in the never-ending battle against AI-generated explicit images. Perhaps legislators will soon also wake up to the immanent threats posed by AI replacing all jobs, or the fact that many experts are saying that AI has a 30% chance of wiping out humanity in the next 10 years? Well, I guess the extinction of the planet would certainly solve the problem of men jerking off to Taylor Swift AI nudes. In the meantime, stay tuned for more updates from the front lines of the deepfake war!”

The post San Francisco Shuts Down 10 Popular AI Porn Sites appeared first on AI Porn Sites | AI Porn News and Reviews.

The site, which drew a crowd of wrong-brained users eager to drop up to $1,500 for custom deepfakes, has been shut down permanently. The creators, nearly 4,000 strong, who made a profit from the seedy and now illegal business of re-imagining the likes of Scarlett Johansson being pounded by black cocks, are left without a platform. The forums where new requests were made have also gone quiet, and the videos are no longer available to view. A notice on the platform blamed a “critical service provider” for the shutdown, stating that data loss made it impossible to continue operations. They warned users not to trust any impostor platforms that might pop up in their absence. Mr. Deepfakes also mentioned that they are not responsible for any future use of their domain, which will eventually expire.

Rumors are swirling about which service pulled the rug out from under Mr. Deepfakes, with researchers pointing fingers at “free-tier cloud GPU access” provided through Google Colab notebooks as a crucial component for these deepfake creators. Google, however, has yet to confirm or deny their involvement in this digital drama. So, while the deepfake porn empire crumbles, users are left to wonder what the future holds for their digital fixations.

The post RIP Mr Deepfakes! appeared first on AI Porn Sites | AI Porn News and Reviews.

On the morning of September 6, authorities received an emergency call from a concerned citizen reporting that A was preparing to jump from the roof of a high-rise building in Andong City. When police and firefighters arrived at the scene, A was standing on top of a water tank on the roof, repeatedly expressing his deep guilt and hopelessness, saying, “I’ve committed a grave sin against society. I don’t want to live anymore.”

It is estimated that 93% of South Korean deepfake porn perverts are teenage boys. Once upon a time, in a more innocent age, such horny and acne ridden youngsters would simply jerk off to magazine and newspaper pictures of their favorite female celebrities. Nowadays, the grubby spawns of Satan can feed those pictures into an AI blender, and out comes a new digital picture of the sexy star complete with exposed titties and love boxes. Thankfully, at least one nation is willing to do what it takes to protect the modesty of twerking scantily clad K-pop hotties. Under new laws demanded by the public, boys who make AI deepfake smut face years in harsh prisons, where the only masturbation they’ll be doing is when looking at the bare stone walls of their cells. Or perhaps, the hairy butts of their cellmates. In any case, many feel these measures go a long way short of curbing the menace of deepfake porn, and there have been calls to restore the death penalty for the first time since 1996, so that these good for nothing AI abusing criminals can be given a one-way ticket to eternal hell!

Source : https://www.koreaboo.com/news/16-year-old-suspect-deepfake-sex-crimes-attempts-take-life/

The post South Korean Teenage Deepfake Porn Suspect Attempts Suicide appeared first on AI Porn Sites | AI Porn News and Reviews.